Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Falcones-Conforme v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Jorge Falcones-Conforme
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Castellan v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Ivan Lopez Castellan
Respondent:
Acting Warden M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fuentes v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Jorge Bello Fuentes
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vega v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Jonathan Vega
Respondent:
Acting Warden M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pol Montero v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Petitioner:
Caonabo Mayobanex Pol Montero
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
Acting Warden S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Waters v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Waters and Karlton Cherry
Defendant:
Warden, Acting Warden S. Brown, J. McCalloum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Villarreal-Solis v. Roane
as 3:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Hugo Villarreal-Solis
Defendant:
Acting Warden D. Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez v. LeFever
as 1:2022cv00587
Petitioner:
Jonathan Barrera Gomez
Respondent:
Acting Warden M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vargas v. Nunley
as 5:2022cv00298
Petitioner:
George Anotnio Vargas
Respondent:
Acting Warden Nunley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
