Cases 31 - 40 of 43
PERRY v. BALLARD et al
as 3:2015cv00068
Defendant:
GEORGE BALLARD and MARK DOVE
Plaintiff:
JASON SETH PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALLARD v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv00254
Petitioner:
JARVIS L. BALLARD
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNCAN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv02028
Respondent:
GREGORY BALLARD, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, COUNTY OF MARION and others
Petitioner:
JACKY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00310
Defendant:
BALLARD, BOOKER, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Fisher v. Rogers et al
as 3:2014cv01666
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Fisher
Defendant:
Bradley Rogers, John Perry, Stephen Bigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNIS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2014cv00150
Respondent:
GREG BALLARD, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, MICHAEL PENCE and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOOKER v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00213
Defendant:
OFFICER BALLARD, JULIE BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BOOKER v. BALLARD et al
as 2:2012cv00152
Defendant:
BALLARD and CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LONG v. WHITE et al
as 1:2012cv00032
Defendant:
GREG BALLARD, LEE HOARD, JOHN AND JANE DOE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH TWO HUNDRED and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. MARVELL et al
as 1:2011cv01122
Defendant:
OFFICER M. BALLARD, LIEUTENANT R. MARVELL and DOCTOR WILLIAM WOLFE
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
