Cases 31 - 40 of 135
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, D. ALSIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR (NAME UNKNOWN), M. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, M. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, NIEMAN, MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. USA
as 2:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Bryant Love
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Manns v. Starke Sheriff Dept Employees et al
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Heather L Manns and Heather Manns
Defendant:
Starke Sheriff Dept Employees, John Lenderman, Cameron Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAYLOR v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
