Cases 31 - 40 of 169
Charles Gamble v. Warden Kenneth Nelson
as 23-6222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES GAMBLE, a/k/a Charles Edward Gamble, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH NELSON, TONYA JAMES, HENDRIX and others
Defendant:
MR. MOORE, MS. SMITH, MR. ROBINSON and others
Burnham v. Gallagher et al
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
Gordon P. Gallagher, T. Gallagher and jtorr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Winden, et al
as 23-1040
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Burnham v. Colorado Department of Corection
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corection
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections and Villani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Jennifer Dabros, Higdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. USA
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
United States, The, State of Colorado and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. The United States, et al
as 22-1436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES, STATE OF COLORADO, GORDON P. GALLAGHER and others
Burnham v. City of Denver
as 1:2022cv03154
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
City of Denver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Winden
as 1:2022cv02835
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Winden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
