Cases 31 - 40 of 63
BANKS v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00294
Petitioner:
GEORGE BANKS
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YORK et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2016cv02539
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK OF MUNCIE IN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, INDIANA STAT PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
DALTON YORK and TINA YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks-Giombetti v. USA
as 2:2016cv00339
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shanti Banks-Giombetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BANKS v. USA
as 1:2016cv01563
Petitioner:
BRANDON BANKS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Restricted Filer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Roberts, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Banks et al
as 2:2015cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Cpl Mary Banks, Karen Coulis and Melissa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00259
Plaintiff:
TELLY S. ARMSTRONG, GEOGRIA BANKS, LUCKY L. CHARLESTON and others
Defendant:
L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HUDSON v. FIRST FINANCIAL BANK
as 1:2014cv00975
Defendant:
FIRST FINANCIAL BANK
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE R. HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BANKS v. MARION COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2014cv00534
Petitioner:
MARCEL BANKS
Respondent:
MARION COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
DEREK HILL
Defendant:
TANYA HILL, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JOHN MOSES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
