Cases 31 - 40 of 866
Thomas v. Fisher et al
as 5:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Frank Thomas
Defendant:
Ross Fisher, Mark Knutson, Cheri Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luginbyhl v. Lawton Corrections Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Defendant:
Lawton Corrections Rehabilitation Center, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. S. Hunter et al
as 4:2023cv03975
Plaintiff:
Joerion Webb
Defendant:
S. Hunter, C.A. Brown and Lt. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford (PS) v. El Paso County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2023cv02677
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Lunsford
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriffs Office and Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 23-40578
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joshua Calhoun
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04046
Petitioner:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant:
TDCJ Director
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodge (PS) v. Calhoun et al
as 1:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane H.W. Goodge
Defendant:
Calhoun and Joseph Roybal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. USA
as 2:2023cv01891
Petitioner:
Joshua Forbes Calhoun
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Calhoun v. Uconn Health et al
as 3:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Christopher Calhoun
Defendant:
Uconn Health, Ersilda Ajce, Natalie J Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodge (PS) v. Calhoun
as 1:2023cv02465
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane H.W. Goodge
Defendant:
Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
