Cases 31 - 40 of 74
CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv00176
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CARL CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stone et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kyle Smith, Joe Riley, Greg Robinson and others
Defendant:
CLU Screening, Ken Faulk, Reggie Nevels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. ATF UC 3749 et al
as 3:2018cv00899
Undetermined:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Nick McClaughen, Det Stutsman, DEA 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. CORIZON HEALTH MEDICAL PROVIDER, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03165
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, TOM RICHARDSON, CAMAY FRANCUM and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN LAMONT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRUITT v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01658
Defendant:
ACKUDALE, BONE, BRODAN and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT, JR v. HALE et al
as 1:2017cv02965
Defendant:
WEBSTER CAMPBELL, MARK DEICHMAN, MARK HALE and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY DEAN KNIGHT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNETT v. NEESE et al
as 2:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
REYMOND BARNETT
Defendant:
ROBERT D. BUGHER, CAMPBELL, R. GAGNON and others
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Neal et al
as 3:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Joseph Charles Campbell
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Jason Nowatzke, Adam Bootz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00433
Petitioner:
JACOB E. CAMPBELL
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00432
Petitioner:
JACOB E. CAMPBELL
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
