Cases 31 - 40 of 630
Cervantes v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02131
Petitioner:
Cosme Castillo Cervantes
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Butler v. Robinson et al
as 1:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Butler
Defendant:
David Robinson, C. Thomas, Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. USA
as 4:2022cv08658
Petitioner:
Henry Cervantes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Raul Cervantes v. V. Torres, et al
as 22-56116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL CERVANTES
Defendant / Appellee:
V. TORRES, Correctional Officer, individual capacity, DANIEL MOISA, Medical Escort, individual capacity and VILLALOBOS, Sgt : individual capacity
Grady Harris v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 22-16785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRADY HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, Warden, K. ROSE, Correctional Sergeant, J. MUNOZ, Correctional Officer and others
(PC) Cervantes v. Porter et al
as 2:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Raul Valenzuela Cervantes
Defendant:
Porter and Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Contreras v. Will County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 1:2022cv05465
Plaintiff:
Omar De Jesus Cervantes Contreras
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
