Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,852
Frodsham v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00464
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner: David Wayne Frodsham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jean #301414 v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00439
Petitioner: Sonny Jean
Respondent: Charles Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Micael v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00411
Defendant: Jason Monson, Charles Ryan, Unknown Villiabos and others
Plaintiff: Mulugeta Yemane Micael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00379
Defendant: Jennifer Williams, Charles Ryan, Corizon Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff: David Richard Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04774
Defendant: Charles Ryan, TSU and Unknown Scott
Plaintiff: Albert Dale Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv04736
Defendant: State of Arizona, Unknown Parties, Charles Ryan and others
Plaintiff: Jorge Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Getzen v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2019cv00349
Plaintiff: David Getzen
Defendant: Charles Ryan, Unknown Parties, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04696
Petitioner: Telly Onturio Beasley
Defendant: Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Getzen v. John Doe et al
as 2:2019cv05938
Plaintiff: David Getzen
Defendant: Charles Ryan and CEO John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Getzen v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv00468
Plaintiff: David Getzen
Defendant: Charles Ryan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?