Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Cortes v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Reuben J Cortes
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, John Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartlett v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Bartlett
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, John Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrickson v. Siegert et al
as 1:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
James S Hendrickson
Defendant:
Rona Siegert, John Migliori, Murray Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michael A McCall
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, John Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rascon v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv00500
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Rascon
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Charles L Ryan , Corizon Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turney et al v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Philip A Turney, Billy Ray Bartlett, James S Hendrickson and others
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, John Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv10008
Plaintiff:
Raymond Martin Wilson
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Incorporated Collectively Corizon Corporations, Sonya Forbes and others
Melinda Valenzuela v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-17364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, JESSICA RAAK, CORIZON INCORPORATED and others
Valenzuela #172770 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03264
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Jessica Raak, Corizon Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
