Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Traywick v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Shaun Traywick
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Woodrow A. Myers, Jr. , Dr. Crocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joslyn v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Joslyn
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Nurse Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00287
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Dudley
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Sgt. Calvin, Nurse Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Corizon Medical Service et al
as 6:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
A C Glover
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Service, David Pavlakovic, Clabo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Fincher et al
as 6:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
DeMichael Mason
Defendant:
Linda Fincher and Corizon Medical Services
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
David Lee Mayo
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. St Clair Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrison
Defendant:
St Clair Correctional Facility, Carter Davenport, Karen Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Thomas et al
as 1:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
Melvin F. Thomas
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Corizon Medical Services Inc, McElroy and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broach v. Thomas et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tony Curtis Broach
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, C. Stewart, Corizon Medical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
