Cases 31 - 40 of 246
Evans v. McNeese et al
as 1:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Vicki Russell and Melissa McNeese
Plaintiff:
Gerald W Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fogleman v. Hubbard
as 1:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shane Fogleman
Defendant:
Evan Hubbard
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Turner et al
as 3:2019cv00300
Petitioner:
Patrick Evans Clark
Respondent:
Attorney General Jim Hood and Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Middlebrooks et al
as 1:2019cv00916
Defendant:
Leddonna Evans, Rodrick Evans, Unknown Brown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lamar Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00901
Plaintiff:
Mario Terrell Rucker
Defendant:
Anthony Beasley, Pelicia Hall, Joshua Csaszar and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Hubbard
as 1:2019cv00820
Plaintiff:
Brandon Fields
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi H.C.A.D.C. and Evan Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Brooks et al
as 3:2019cv00774
Defendant:
Latasha Brooks, Tirah Mixon, Vivian Evans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leffew v. Peterson et al
as 1:2019cv00793
Defendant:
Evan Hubbard, Elaine Lege, Unknown Freeman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ernest Eugene Leffew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Updyke
as 3:2019cv00756
Plaintiff:
Edwin Gilbert Evans
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Daniel Updyke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benoman v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00742
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Benoman
Defendant:
Lisa Howell, State of Mississippi, Marcus D. Evans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
