Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Ransom v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2011cv00875
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Ransom
Defendant:
S. Hubbard, E. Arnold, S. Albritton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Ransom v. Secretary of California Dept., et al
as 11-15838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, C GREAVES, P. WILSON and others
Ransom v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitations, et al.
as 1:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Ransom
Defendant:
Secretary of California Dept. of Corrections & Rehalibations, C. Greaves, P. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Lopez v. Sue Hubbard, et al
as 10-17364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUE HUBBARD, G. RODRIGUEZ, E. ARNOLD and others
Rodriguez v. Artu
as 10-3778
Petitioner - Appellant:
Otes G. Rodriguez
Respondent - Appellee:
Dale Artus, Supt.
Glass v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 1:2010cv01652
Plaintiff:
Raymond George Glass
Defendant:
G. Rodriguez and J. Goodrick-Reynaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sessions v. Gillum et al
as 3:2010cv01054
Defendant:
Mrs. B. Carter, Mr. J. Gillum and Captain G. Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maidens v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00874
Defendant:
Brendon Alexander, Sgt. Cook, A. Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Maidens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marco Rodriguez v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-41228
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO G RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Puckett v. Steadman et al
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Defendant:
T. W. Steadman, M. Wilkins, R. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
