Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Haro v. Camargo et al
as 3:2014cv01782
Plaintiff:
Johnny Joe Haro
Defendant:
D. Camargo, J. Sais, L. Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Northington v. USA, et al
as 14-55634
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CRAIG BRYAN NORTHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID SHOEMAKER, MAHESH PATEL, ALEX HERRERA and others
Lua v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Hugo Lua
Defendant:
O. Smith, H. Haro, A. Haddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivy v. Mims et al
as 1:2013cv01719
Plaintiff:
Quincy Lamon Ivy
Defendant:
Margaret Mims, J Scott, Haros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Ferguson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. TRAVIS BRAGG, LEO LAWRENCE ALTENBERG, Medical Doctor, Clinical Director, RODRIGO CHAVEZ, Health Services Administrator and others
Allen et al v. Rednour et al
as 3:2013cv00851
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen, Darren Henderson, Derrick Parks and others
Defendant:
David A Rednour, Richard Harrington, Shannis Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnny Joe Haro v. John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2013cv04887
Plaintiff:
Johnny Joe Haro
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00912
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Steven Ferguson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. TRAVIS BRAGG, LEO LAWRENCE ALTENBERG, Medical Doctor, Clinical Director, RODRIGO CHAVEZ, Health Services Administrator and others
Haro-Covarrubias v. USA
as 3:2013cv00358
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Luis Humberto Haro-Covarrubias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
