Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Heare v. SCI Huntingdon et al
as 4:2014cv00340
Petitioner:
Roger Ernest Heare, Sr.
Respondent:
SCI Huntingdon, Richard J. Walsh and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PITTMAN v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2014cv00231
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, JON WETZEL and J. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. Will County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 1:2013cv05764
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Walsh
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Facility, Michael O'Leary, Deputy Chief G. Marotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fragosa v. Madison et al
as 1:2013cv04906
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fragosa
Defendant:
Edward Madison, Emilio J. Santana, William Roys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00483
Defendant:
R. Baker, Dr. Bannister, D. Bequette and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Steve Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodhouse v. Walsh
as 7:2011cv02945
Petitioner:
Clarence Woodhouse
Respondent:
James J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Kirkpatrick
as 11-1537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter Lopez
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert A. Kirkpatrick, Superintendent Wende Correctional Facility, William R. Smith, Deputy Superintendent of Program, Girard Monahan, Deputy Superintendent of Security and others
Price v. Walsh
as 1:2010cv04789
Petitioner:
Larme Price
Respondent:
Warden James J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vargas v. Walsh
as 1:2010cv07604
Petitioner:
Eville Vargas
Respondent:
James J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmonson v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2010cv00812
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin , Leonard Kachinsky, State Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
