Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Skandha v. Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health et al
as 1:2015cv12581
Plaintiff:
Bodhisattva Skandha
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health, Thomas Groblewski, Linda Albohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2015cv10728
Plaintiff:
Surpaul Cottrell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Parole Board Members Jane and John Doe, Parole Officers John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abernathy v. Dewey et al
as 1:2015cv10431
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Shawn Dewey, John Doe #1, Michael Rumery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schultz v. Groblewski et al
as 1:2015cv10020
Plaintiff:
Jason J Schultz
Defendant:
Thomas Alexander Groblewski, Geraldine Summers, Julie Ireland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Boston Herald et al
as 1:2015cv10022
Plaintiff:
Barry Spencer
Defendant:
Boston Herald, Boston Globe, Jane Doe Reporter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace et al v. Cousins et al
as 1:2014cv14767
Plaintiff:
Willie Wallace
Defendant:
Frank Cousins, Michael Marks, Heath Carafa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baams v. Coakley et al
as 1:2013cv13115
Plaintiff:
Ronny Baams, Jr.
Defendant:
Martha Coakley, Peter A. Pepe, Bruce Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Matos et al v. William A.Hinton State Laboratory et al
as 1:2013cv12885
Plaintiff:
Justin De Matos
Defendant:
William A. Hinton State Laboratory, Annie Dookhan and John & Jane Doe's 1 & 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2013cv12040
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jackson
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and James J. Saba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemon v. Louis et al
as 1:2013cv11523
Plaintiff:
Eugene Flemon
Defendant:
Farachan Louis, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
