Cases 31 - 40 of 4,976
Coe v. Ewing et al
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
John M. Ewing, Sherin Dackairaj, Nadia Maria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Huntsville Parole et al
as 6:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
John A. Boswell
Defendant:
Huntsville Parole, Carmella Jones, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
John A Boswell
Defendant:
TDC Region 1, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Carmella Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Jennings et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Walter Mosley
Defendant:
Debra Jennings, Christi Greenwalt, John Clum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Robert Price, Jr
Defendant:
John Doe and Lucas Courrier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John v. Grant et al
as 3:2024cv00957
Petitioner:
Robert Charles John
Respondent:
NFN Grant and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
