Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Haskins v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02282
Plaintiff:
Westley Vance Haskins
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Scott Marquardt, Jim Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake et al v. Hanna et al
as 3:2013cv08129
Plaintiff:
Deepraj Drake and Ramonica Barnes
Defendant:
John Hanna, R Johnson, Aaron Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv01731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Edward Long
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Stacey Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skinner #193387 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01729
Plaintiff:
James E Skinner
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Ron Credio, Lance Hefner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman #133444 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01493
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Mike Linderman, Unknown Credio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dini #140699 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01486
Plaintiff:
Francisco DeWayne Dini
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, S Childs, Unknown Miser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rozenman v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Rozenman
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. Kaminsky et al
as 2:2011cv02202
Plaintiff:
Karl David Ratliff
Defendant:
Joel Kaminsky, Jason Cvancara, Mathew Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Ryan et al
as 4:2011cv00686
Petitioner:
John LJ Long
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Long v. Ryan et al
as 4:2011cv00550
Petitioner:
Richard Lawrence Long
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
