Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 2:2010cv00075
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Smith
Respondent:
Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director and State of Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Ronnie Smith
as 09-35127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONNIE LYNN SMITH
Smith v. Beninato
as 4:2008cv00186
Plaintiff:
William Lynn Smith
Defendant:
John J. Beninato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Donald et al
as 4:2008cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Lynn Smith
Defendant:
James Donald and Dale Herndon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Courtney Matthews v. Robert Wedemeyer, et al
as 08-6392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY B. MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WILEY WEDEMEYER, Judge, JERRY LYNN SMITH, Judge, DAVID H. WELLS, Judge and others
Mathews v. Wedemeyer et al
as 3:2008cv00820
Petitioner:
Courtney B. Mathews
Respondent:
Robert Wiley Wedemeyer, Jerry Lynn Smith, David H. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. USA
as 4:2008cv00029
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lynn Smith
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Banks v. Williams et al
as 1:2007cv02841
Petitioner:
Leroy Banks
Respondent:
Thalrone Williams, Dept. of Corrections of the State of Georgia, Georgia Pardon and Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Quarterman et al
as 2:2007cv00171
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Nathaniel A Quarterman, C Harrell, P Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Supreme Co. of the U.S. et al
as 2:2007cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Supreme Co. of the U.S., William K Suter, Charles R Fulbruge, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
