Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Gibbs v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Larry Alonzo Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommy Seagraves, Nye, Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakus v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Stephen Drakus
Defendant:
Nassau County Sheriff Tommy Seagraves, Lt. Nye, Capt. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coates v. Corey et al
as 3:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Joseph Arthur Coates, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela B. Corey, John Gardiner Kalinowski, Robert M. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Corey et al
as 3:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Larry Alonzo Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela B. Corey, John Gardiner Kalinowski, Robert M. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakus v. Corey et al
as 3:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Stephan Drakus
Defendant:
Angela B. Corey, John Gardiner Kalinowski, Robert M. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMannes v. Corey et al
as 3:2013cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joseph McMannes
Defendant:
Angela B. Corey, Stephen Wayne Siegel, Robert M. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy King v. Alabama DOC, et al
as 12-13985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY KING
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. FOSTER, A. JAMES and others
Arbuckle v. Ahern et al
as 3:2012cv03076
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bertran Arbuckle
Defendant:
Gregory J. Ahern, M. Foster and S. Sexton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Randy King
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , M. Foster , A. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Perry et al
as 5:2011cv04530
Plaintiff:
Reginald Robertson
Defendant:
W Perry, R M Foster and Alameda County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
