Cases 31 - 40 of 403
Sakon v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
John Alan Sakon
Defendant:
John Johnson, F Perrone, Bruce D. Skehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norwood v. USA
as 3:2022cv01492
Petitioner:
Michael Norwood
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gramegna v. Dorantes
as 3:2022cv01024
Petitioner:
Michael-Paul Gramegna
Respondent:
Vanessa Dorantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bobowski v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
Michael Bobowski
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Drapelick Center, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nicks v. Pullen et al
as 3:2022cv00925
Petitioner:
Sherita Nicks
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen, Patrick McFarland and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bronfman v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv00838
Petitioner:
Clare Bronfman
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bryan Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Verity v. Hargreaves et al
as 3:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Michael Verity
Defendant:
Jonathan Hargreaves, Mahboob Ashraf, Juanita Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hajati v. Garland et al
as 3:2022cv00711
Petitioner:
George Hajati
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Michael Carvajal and Alix M. McLearen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
