Cases 31 - 40 of 255
Baldwin v. Myers et al
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Baldwin
Defendant:
Kim Myers and Carl Kuenzli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen v. Wexford of Indiana LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana LLC, Shalana R Serifert, James R Cattin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. English et al
as 3:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Lance Perkins and Lance A Perkins
Defendant:
English, Ms Angel, Myers and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2022cv02468
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GIBSON
Defendant:
SAMMY JOSEPH, MYERS, PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waite v. English et al
as 3:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
John W Waite, IV
Defendant:
English, Erter, Myers and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORGENSEN v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv02346
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JORGENSEN
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY INDIANA, MATTHEW A. MYERS, LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE JR v. MYERS
as 1:2022cv02310
Plaintiff:
DAVID W LEE JR
Defendant:
MATTHEW MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUSHANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
JASEN LYNN DUSHANE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NICOLE OSBORN, M. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ARNEY v. MYERS
as 1:2022cv02135
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CURTIS ARNEY
Defendant:
MATTHEW MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERGER v. MYERS
as 1:2022cv02024
Plaintiff:
BRAEDEN W BERGER
Defendant:
MATTHEW MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
