Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Almond v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Sharon Almond
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Ted Sakai , State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv02797
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lankford
Defendant:
Joseph Taylor, Benjamin Griego, Jodi Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tia v. Feagai et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Sgt. Feagai, HCF Inmate Grievance Specialist, M. Keopuhiwa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Uehara et al
as 1:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Nolan Uehara, Jan Molina, Vaovasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit et al
as 1:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Thomas Doe, Canby Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brisken v. Mun et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jhon Nigel Brisken
Defendant:
Wesley Mun and Nolan Espinda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia et al v. Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF) Mafia et al
as 1:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia and Faleatafa E. Bentley
Defendant:
Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF) Mafia, Edward Vergara, Joyce K. Matsumori-Hoshijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardines v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kurt Russell Cardines
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v Espinda et al
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaonohi Perry, Jr.
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Tuitama et al
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pitts
Defendant:
Tuitama, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
