Cases 31 - 40 of 206
Reed v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Reuben Reed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Jessica Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkland v. Paxton et al
as 4:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Clay Jarrad Kirkland
Defendant:
Ken Paxton and Thu Thai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01185
Petitioner:
Dean Edward Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden FNU Delap, Ken Paxton and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01195
Petitioner:
Dean Edward Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden FNU Delap, Ken Paxton and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burkeen v. Paxton
as 4:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Dell Burkeen, II
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantez v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maria Cervantez and Maria Concepcion Valenzuela Cervantez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Cris Love, Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv03523
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Wayne Mack
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Ken Paxton and Nathan Tadema
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Abbott et al
as 3:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Don A Wright
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Cecilia Abbott, Creuzot John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2022cv02213
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Greg Abbott and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Smith
as 1:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone
Respondent:
Jimmy S. Smith, Internal Revenue Service and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
