Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Pittman v. USA
as 5:2016cv00494
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dariel Tyree Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pittman v. USA
as 4:2016cv00106
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Travis Jermaine Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Scruggs v. Knight et al
as 5:2016ct03121
Plaintiff:
Franklin D. Scruggs
Defendant:
James Knight and Sergeant Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Pittman et al
as 1:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
FNU Pittman, FNU Ball, FNU Burleson and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. NC Department of Public Safety/Division of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Lewis, Jamie R. Spake and Dana A. Shedd
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety/Division of Prisons, David W. Guice, Frank L. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Hight et al
as 5:2015ct03184
Plaintiff:
Randolph Wilson
Defendant:
Henry W. Hight, Jr., Robert H. Hobgood, Susan Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Pittman et al
as 5:2015ct03182
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Capt. Pittman, Officer Ball, Officer Burleson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMMER v. THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv00859
Plaintiff:
EDDIE EUGENE CLEMMER
Defendant:
THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, KEVIN AUTEN, KRUC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Mecklenburg County Municipality et al
as 3:2014cv00451
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Pittman
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Municipality, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department and FNU Selogy
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
FIORE v. THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KEVIN AUTEN, MILEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
