Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 47
PORTER v. USA
as 1:2016cv00648
Petitioner: THOMAS CHARLES PORTER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Porter v. USA
as 5:2016cv00325
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Kenneth Eugene Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WICKS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2016cv00162
Plaintiff: DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant: LOCKLEAR, BRIMMER, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00373
Petitioner: Wayne Porter
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cooke v. Andrews
as 5:2013hc02164
Petitioner: Randle Porter Cooke
Respondent: Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HOSKINS et al v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01087
Plaintiff: DAVID A. HOSKINS, MICHAEL A. PORTER, JAMORRIS R. PRICE and others
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, BETTY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hoskins et al v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2012ct03188
Plaintiff: David A. Hoskins, Michael A. Porter, Jamorris R. Price and others
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Scotland Correctional Institution, Betty Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sealed Defendant 1 v. USA
as 5:2012cv00298
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Gregory Lavon Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Porter v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2012ct03044
Plaintiff: Shawn Christopher Porter
Defendant: Kenneth E. Lassiter, Lt. Lawarence, Mrs. Hills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Kenworthy et al
as 5:2012ct03010
Plaintiff: Ricky Gamble
Defendant: George Kenworthy, William Bullard, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?