Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Antoinne Smith v. Sergeant E. Watkin
as 15-7907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT WATKINS
Defendant:
ROBERT GREEN, Warden and MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Harris v. Wallenstein et al
as 1:2014cv03337
Plaintiff:
Pierce Harris
Defendant:
Author Wallenstein, Robert Green and Linda Wingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Green et al
as 8:2014cv02843
Plaintiff:
Pierce Harris
Defendant:
Robert Green, Aurthur Wallenstein, Linda Wingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Watkins et al
as 8:2013cv03893
Plaintiff:
Antoinne Lewis Smith
Defendant:
E. Watkins, Robert Green and Montgomery County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Tweh v. Robert Green
as 13-8026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS N. TWEH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GREEN, CAPTAIN PAYNE, CORPORAL MUHAMMAD and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT JEFFERS
Smith v. Montgomery County Correctional Facility et al
as 8:2013cv03177
Plaintiff:
Antoinne Lewis Smith
Defendant:
Montgomery County Correctional Facility, Arthur Wallenstein, Robert Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv04055
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GREEN
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA, CINDY SWEENEY and FRANCIS MEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foltz v. Green et al
as 1:2013cv00412
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Ireland Foltz
Respondent:
Robert Green and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Tweh v. Robert Greene
as 13-6002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS N. TWEH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GREENE, CAPTAIN PAYNE, SERGEANT JEFFERS and others
Okpeku v. Greene
as 8:2012cv02978
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Okpeku
Respondent:
Robert Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
