Cases 31 - 40 of 390
Wilson v. US Attorney et al
as 5:2023hc02037
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
US Attorney and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haughey v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03037
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Haughey
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. FCC Butner et al
as 5:2022ct03457
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
FCC Butner, Lynn B. Kelly, Officer Sosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hemphill v. Bruno et al
as 5:2023ct03008
Plaintiff:
Scott Devon Hemphill
Defendant:
Officer Bruno, Officer Massenburg and Nichole Leszeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haughey v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02207
Petitioner:
Scott Allen Haughey
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pridgen v. Judge et al
as 5:2023ct03018
Plaintiff:
Richard Pridgen
Defendant:
Warden Cathy Judge, Assoc. Warden Tyrell Griggs, Nurse Erin Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNO v. SCOTT
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
DAVID MANNO
Defendant:
KEITH SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANDLEMAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SCOTT RANDLEMAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Manno v. Scott
as 5:2023ct03003
Plaintiff:
David Manno
Defendant:
Keith Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. ODRC OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION STATE
as 1:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JERRY SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
ODRC OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
