Cases 31 - 40 of 1,029
Thomas v. Smith
as 5:2023ct03235
Plaintiff:
Dalveccio Tremaine Thomas
Defendant:
Sergeant Smith, Mr. Petrelli, Lt. T. Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
S. Shane Smith
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections, Todd Ishee, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pettis v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Austin Devon Pettis
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Smith, FNU Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meris et al v. Burgess et al
as 5:2023ct03214
Plaintiff:
Larry Junior Meris and Aspa Ty Mateo
Defendant:
Captain Burgess, Sergeant Foggs, Mrs. Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02159
Petitioner:
Amarion Smith
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Dexter Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2023cv00591
Petitioner:
ROBERT EMERSON SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03204
Plaintiff:
Greg H. Johnson
Defendant:
Sergeant Cooper, A. Threat, Officer Canon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lezczak et al
as 5:2023ct03177
Plaintiff:
Greg H. Johnson
Defendant:
Nurse N. Lezczak, E. Walker, B. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Lechner et al
as 5:2023ct03148
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Porter
Defendant:
Officer Lechner, Officer Smith and Sergeant Wilburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
