Cases 31 - 40 of 1,033
Byrd v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Byrd
Defendant:
Mr. T. Hamilton, John Does and Mr. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Combs et al
as 7:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. J. Combs, Mr. Anderson, B.L. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peden v. Chopp et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Quamaine Peden
Defendant:
M. Chopp and T. Woodhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Mixson et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Darren Douglas
Defendant:
W. Mixson, T. Johnson and STATEFARM Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuler v. Branch et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Eugene Peter Schuler
Defendant:
Sgt. Branch, T. Williams and Elizabeth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strand v. Aderson
as 2:2023cv00688
Petitioner:
Evron T. Strand
Respondent:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodson v. Dye et al
as 7:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. T. Dye, Ms. Sater, Mr. Widener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strand v. Aderson
as 7:2023cv00805
Petitioner:
Evron T. Strand
Respondent:
Warden D. Aderson and Warden D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
