Cases 31 - 40 of 2,501
Enix v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Tyler Ward Enix
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jeremy Sims
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
English v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Jon English
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole, Core Civic Prison and RDAP Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. TN Dept of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Linda R. Thomas, Ricky Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5243
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. CARMODY
Defendant:
TDOC, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, LEE DOTSON, Asst. Commissioner, in his official and individual capacities and others
Liles v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Liles
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Medical Department, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lanier
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
