Cases 31 - 40 of 420
CHRISTIAN v. GARMAN et al
as 1:2020cv01842
Defendant:
Tom Wolfe, Major Selfrige, Staff Empl MR. Eby and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kehoe v. Kauffman et al
as 3:2020cv01717
Respondent:
Tom Wolf and Mr. Kauffman
Petitioner:
John C. Kehoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAMM v. ZAGORSKIE et al
as 2:2020cv04659
Defendant:
TOM HOGAN, RONALD C. NAGLE, CHARLES (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) and others
Plaintiff:
ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINSON v. UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU et al
as 2:2020cv01312
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNO TOM WOLF, JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU and others
Plaintiff:
PIERRE PINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANDREWS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2020cv04326
Respondent:
Secretary JOHN WETZEL, TOM MCGINLEY and MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Petitioner:
Maurice Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SEWELL v. HARPER et al
as 2:2020cv01302
Petitioner:
LEON SEWELL
Respondent:
DISTRICT JUDGE TOM P. CAULFIELD and ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruffin v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2020cv01461
Defendant:
Governor Tom Wolfe, Secretary John E. Wetzel, K. Kauffman and others
Plaintiff:
Cleo Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talbert v. Pennsylvania State Correctional Officer Association et al
as 3:2020cv01154
Defendant:
Jaime Sorber, Lt K Young, Laural Harry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Talbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD et al v. PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 2:2020cv00931
Respondent:
TOM WOLF, ORLANDO HARPER, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Petitioner:
River Silverelk, Laura Michelle Schlemmer, FREDERICK BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mincy v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2020cv00717
Plaintiff:
Hilton Mincy
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office, Kevin Kauffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
