Cases 31 - 40 of 78
JERRY-EL v. LUTHER
as 2:2016mc00404
Petitioner:
BERNARD CARTER JERRY-EL
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER and BEAVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EL-AMIN v. SIX UNKNOWN FEDERAL PRISON OFFICERS et al
as 1:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
SALEEM EL-AMIN
Defendant:
SIX UNKNOWN FEDERAL PRISON OFFICERS, Lambert, ROSENCRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL-AMIN v. SIX UNKNOWN FEDERAL PRISON OFFICERS et al
as 2:2015cv06497
Plaintiff:
SALEEM EL-AMIN
Defendant:
SIX UNKNOWN FEDERAL PRISON OFFICERS, LAMBERT, ROSENCRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES EL v. MOONEY et al
as 5:2015cv04103
Petitioner:
CRAIG HINES EL
Respondent:
MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EL-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv02631
Plaintiff:
EL-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS-EL v. MEANS et al
as 2:2015cv00537
Petitioner:
ALTER EVANS-EL
Respondent:
RAYFORD ALLEN MEANS, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLY PHAROAH M.M.H.R.A.A.L.S.A. EL BEY, ED.D v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv05503
Petitioner:
HOLY PHAROAH M.M.H.R.A.A.L.S.A. EL BEY., ED.D
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JERRY-EL v. PETSOCK
as 2:2014cv00707
Petitioner:
BERNARD CARTER JERRY-EL
Respondent:
GEORGE PETSOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROOKS-EL v. BRICK TRIPP
as 2:2014cv01199
Plaintiff:
WALTER BROOKS-EL
Defendant:
BRICK TRIPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACKSON-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv04179
Petitioner:
REGINALD ALLEN JACKSON-EL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ERIC HOLDER , UNITED STATES CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
