Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
RANKINS v. KELLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant: ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR., REUBEN F. YOUNG, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBSTER v. USA
as 1:2012cv00009
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: TIMOTHY JAMES WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011hc02137
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248
Knowles v. Lewis et al
as 5:2011ct03113
Plaintiff: Perry Vincent Knowles
Defendant: Robert C. Lewis, Paula Y. Smith, Joseph Lightsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. Webster et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00300
Plaintiff: Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant: Sterling Webster, Brian Strickland, Jeremy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moneyhan et al v. Keller et al
as 5:2010ct03053
Plaintiff: Boyce S. Moneyhan and Donald Nelson
Defendant: Alvin W. Keller, Robert C. Lewis, Jennie Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. USA
as 5:2009cv00562
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Webster Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dewalt v. Hart et al
as 5:2009ct03080
Plaintiff: Rocky Lee Dewalt
Defendant: Officer Hart, Officer Webster and Officer Royster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vann v. Beck et al
as 5:2008hc02031
Petitioner: Webster Dayton Vann
Respondent: Theodis Beck and North Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tompkins v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2007ct03152
Plaintiff: Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant: Department of Correction, T. R. Carroll, Chris Batten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?