Cases 31 - 40 of 22,890
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramey v. Askew et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Chaplain Askew, Sgt. Salter, Antonio McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Gillion et al
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Kenneth Gillion, S Moore, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sylvester v. Rowlins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rowlins and Jimmie Brayboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Ward et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Cam Ward, Leigh Gwanthney, Darryl Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sylvester v. Rowlins (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rowlins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitts v. Herbert et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Sarah Pitts
Defendant:
Angel Herbert, Burton Dunn, Vanessa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Kelli Wise, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ridgeway v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Clifton Marshall Ridgeway
Defendant:
Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
