Cases 31 - 40 of 1,063
Corns v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024ct03093
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Corns
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Sgt. Santifull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lutz v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02082
Petitioner:
Joshua D. Lutz
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Breeden v. Eason et al
as 5:2024ct03087
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Breeden
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Eason, Correctional Officer Wargo, Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhinehardt v. Moore et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tyree Rhinehardt
Defendant:
D. F. Moore, AJ Osmer and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Todd Ishee and Teresa O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUMPER v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. JUMPER, JR.
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, PETER BUCHHOLTZ, KENO WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02058
Petitioner:
Clarence Michael Ransom
Respondent:
Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Summers v. Dawn et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Sheldon D Summers
Defendant:
FNU Dawn, FNU Steel, FNU Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Larry Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
