Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Milhouse v. Marr et al
as 1:2015cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
Robert Marr, John Doe, David Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Little et al v. Mottern et al
as 1:2014cv00953
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Little and Kareem H. Milhouse
Defendant:
B. Mottern, Boussaug, Loyek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Sage et al
as 3:2014cv00905
Plaintiff:
Joseph S Mitchell
Defendant:
J Sage, Kevin Pigos, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner v. Clark et al
as 3:2013cv03010
Plaintiff:
Felton Gardner
Defendant:
Clark, Novallis, Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Butler et al
as 1:2013cv02106
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
D. Butler, L. Hunt, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rivera v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Osauldo Rivera
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP-Canaan Food Service Administrator, USP-Canaan Food Service Foremans and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Milhouse v. Bledsoe et al
as 1:2011cv02110
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, John Does 1-10 and Matthew Edinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TINSLEY v. MAZZOLA et al
as 2:2011cv06408
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. MAZZOLA, GREGORY E. SMITH, DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMUELS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2011cv05420
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SAMUELS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., GIORLA, DEP. COM. JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.