Cases 41 - 50 of 608
Kaufmann v. Fields
as 5:2023ct03045
Plaintiff:
Chase Kaufmann
Defendant:
Deputy B. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISOM v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
BENNY LYNN ISOM
Defendant:
USA, WARDEN JOHN GILLEY, B. CHITTWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wheeler v. FCC Butner et al
as 5:2023ct03024
Plaintiff:
Juarez Wheeler
Defendant:
FCC Butner, FCI 2 Butner, FCI Fairton NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parsons v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2023ct03020
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Parsons
Defendant:
Nicole Sullivan, Todd Ishee, Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS-BEY v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZA L.P. THOMAS-BEY and ABDI KEBA-BEY
Defendant:
SHARON A. DAVIS, CURTISS MORRISS, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kelly
as 5:2022ct03459
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kunlay Williams
Defendant:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. FCC Butner et al
as 5:2022ct03457
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
FCC Butner, Lynn B. Kelly, Officer Sosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Furr v. Chief of Selma Police Department et al
as 5:2022ct03455
Plaintiff:
Julian Terell Furr
Defendant:
Chief of Selma Police Department, Thomas Lock, Director of NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. T.A.R.C. Staff
as 5:2022ct03453
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Parsons
Defendant:
T.A.R.C. Staff, Program Staff of Central Prison, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
