Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Woolman v. Lancaster County Corrections
as 4:2011cv03044
Respondent:
Lancaster County Attroneys Office
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael B. Woolman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herzog v. Stephenson et al
as 8:2010cv00381
Defendant:
Tylannne Beure, Bill Gibbs, Joel B. Jay and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew A. Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landin v. Ives
as 8:2010cv00166
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Petitioner:
Pablo R. Landin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bush v. Thomas et al
as 4:2009cv03222
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Thomas and Lancaster County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Thurber et al
as 4:2009cv03156
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Thurber and Lancaster County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Bailey et al
as 4:2009cv03141
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Melanie Bailey and Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Osborn et al
as 4:2009cv03140
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Connie Osborn and Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Brandt et al
as 4:2009cv03138
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald Brandt and Lancaster County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Thurber, et al.
as 4:2009cv03076
Petitioner:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Thurber, Paul D. Merritt and Tyler G. Jacobsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Murphree et al
as 8:2008cv00461
Plaintiff:
Maurice Levon Coleman, Sr.
Defendant:
Kristina B. Murphree, Jennie Dugan-Hinrichs, Joseph F. Bataillon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
