Cases 41 - 50 of 436
Hubbard v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Aaron C. Hubbard
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McKelvey v. Spence et al
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jamel McKelvey
Defendant:
C. O. Spence and South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Shaunta C. Crosby
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dairion E. Morgan
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Young, FCI Beckley Warden Heckard, Doctor Roger Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
C.J. v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
C. J.
Defendant:
David Jones, Matthew Currence and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belcher v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00316
Petitioner:
Stephan C. Belcher
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fiorentino v. Wolfe et al
as 5:2022cv00304
Petitioner:
Henry Fiorentino
Respondent:
R.M. Wolfe and C. Nunley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett, G.M. Alprin, Muriel Bowser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kuhn v. 7 Unknown Correction Officers et al
as 3:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kuhn
Defendant:
7 Unknown Correction Officers, Betsy C. Jividen, First Name Unknown Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
William C. Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
