Cases 41 - 50 of 136
Mick v. Randall
as 8:2017cv00082
Petitioner:
Steven E. Mick
Respondent:
Gary B. Randall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mumin v. Frakes et al
as 4:2017cv03032
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, Steena Beltz, Valorie Benedixen and others
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 4:2017cv03004
Defendant:
Wayne Chandler, Scott R. Frakes, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reddick v. Paine et al
as 8:2016cv00556
Defendant:
Nicholas Giles and Mary Paine
Plaintiff:
Dwight E. Reddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epp et al v. Frakes et al
as 4:2016cv03176
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, Steena Beltz, Valorie Benedixen and others
Plaintiff:
William Epp and Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Frakes
as 4:2016cv03162
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Gage
as 8:2016cv00442
Respondent:
Brian Gage
Petitioner:
Michael E. Harris
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2016cv00403
Defendant:
Case Manager Alfred, John and Jane Does, Unit Manager Brad Extrom and others
Plaintiff:
Heath E. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2016cv03133
Petitioner:
Damion E. Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Aleman Tsuhako v. Monzon
as 8:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jorge E. Aleman Tsuhako
Defendant:
Carlos Monzon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
