Cases 41 - 50 of 279
Hawbaker v. Dix et al
as 3:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Major Robert Sewell, Sheriff Darrell Dix and Captain K. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Donald F. Hawbaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowart v. Royle et al
as 5:2020cv00049
Defendant:
Corp. Tomilinson, Capt. Ralfe Pittman, Sheriff Randy F. Royle and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Cowart, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01705
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
B. Stirling, R. B. Harwell, S. C. Admin. Law Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BROWN v. GILLIS et al
as 3:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
JIMELL RAHEEN BROWN
Defendant:
Donald W. Gillis, TREUTLEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DUBLIN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, SPECIAL ADA JOSHUA E KIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Lee Arrendale State Prison et al
as 2:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Lee Arrendale State Prison and B+F SMU
Plaintiff:
Sandtoro E. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01092
Petitioner:
Nicholas L Williams and Jerome F. Deering Bey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BROWN v. GILLIS et al
as 5:2020cv00092
Plaintiff:
JIMELL RAHEEN BROWN
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE DONALD W GILLIS, TREUTLEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DUBLIN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, JUDGE JON F HELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guentangue v. Rivas et al
as 5:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Guentangue
Defendant:
Major F. Rivas, Patrick Gartland, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foltzenlogel v. Greene et al
as 1:2019cv05743
Defendant:
Brendan F. Murphy, Reuben M. Greene and Grady Moore
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Foltzenlogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
