Cases 41 - 50 of 449
BUTLER v. YANKENLLOW et al
as 5:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
DARRYL PERNELL BUTLER
Defendant:
ELLEN H YANKENLLOW, JUANITA YVETTE WILLIAMS THORPE, COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOWDEN v. LANIER et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
STEVEN THOMAS SNOWDEN
Respondent:
JUDGE HEATHER H LANIER, TRE MCLENDON, RUSSELL WENG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Barnhill et al
as 5:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Zabad Washington
Defendant:
District Attorney George Barnhill, Sheriff Randy F. Royal, Sheriff Carl James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohns et al v. Loncon et al
as 4:2021cv00234
Plaintiff:
Gordon D'Andre Cohns, Tammie Hamilton, Nikita Moor and others
Defendant:
Charles V. Loncon, Andrette Watson, Thomas Bateski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLENDON v. WARD
as 1:2021cv00140
Petitioner:
JUSTICE SHUNTE MCCLENDON
Respondent:
TIMOTHY C WARD and H DWIGHT HAMRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sims v. Kemp et al
as 4:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Sims
Defendant:
Gov. Brian Kemp, Department of Corrections, Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Bell et al
as 1:2021cv02699
Plaintiff:
David Lee Rogers
Defendant:
Melanie M. Bell, Kimberly D. Degonia, Layla H. Zon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banda v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
Alick Ricky Banda
Defendant:
Randy Davis, D. Horton, Chief of Security H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2021cv00188
Defendant:
S. Perry, Boils, Deputy Carrol and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Vincent Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. State of GA et al
as 1:2021cv02487
Petitioner:
William H. Miller
Respondent:
Hart County and State of GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
