Cases 41 - 50 of 345
Carter v. Armourdor et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Anthony Antonio Carter
Defendant:
Unknown Armourdor, Unknown Arresting Officer and John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isby v. Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00187
Petitioner:
Anthony Isby
Respondent:
Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. M.D.O.C.
as 3:2021cv00755
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. White
Defendant:
M.D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitehurst v. Vereen
as 3:2021cv00598
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martiz Whitehurst, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Walter Vereen
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Strong v. Mississippi Department of Correction et al
as 1:2021cv00144
Petitioner:
Anthony Strong
Respondent:
Mississippi Department of Correction and Kay Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armon v. Cain
as 3:2021cv00586
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Armon
Defendant:
Mr. Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. United States of America et al.
as 3:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America, S. Harjl, G.A. Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Glatt v. Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility
as 3:2021cv00189
Petitioner:
Kelly Anthony Glatt
Respondent:
Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Rouse v. USA
as 4:2021cv00105
Petitioner:
Anthony Rouse
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McKinley v. Frazier et al
as 3:2021cv00528
Plaintiff:
Anthony Frank McKinley
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Frazier, Dr. Unknown Farmer, Unknown Sick Call Screener and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
