Cases 41 - 50 of 4,271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romeo #266244 v. Stewart et al
as 2:2021cv01846
Plaintiff:
James Elliott Romeo
Defendant:
Terry Stewart, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill #068563 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01457
Plaintiff:
Isiah Hill
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, C Ryan, Unknown Slade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunlap #124173 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2021cv00282
Petitioner:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter #038313 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01228
Plaintiff:
James R Hunter
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Galvan, Unknown Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courtney v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01202
Plaintiff:
Justin Courtney
Defendant:
David Shinn, Charles L Ryan and Corizon Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hertel v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08044
Defendant:
Unknown Montiel, David Shinn, Charles L Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Karl Hertel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders #118868 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Petitioner:
Edward John Sanders
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Pannan Days, et al
as 20-16757
Defendant / Appellee:
PANNAN DAYS, Deputy Warden at SMU II Eyman Florence, THOMAS, Unknown; Sergeant, UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "NROD; Northern Regional Operation Director" at Arizona State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Hursey v. Ryan
as 2:2020cv02416
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C Hursey
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
