Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Cobb v. United States Of America
as 6:2012cv00187
Petitioner:
Martin Darnell Cobb
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cobb v. Smith County Sheriff's Dept & Jail
as 6:2010cv00638
Plaintiff:
Lamar Duane Cobb
Defendant:
Smith County Sheriff's Dept & Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Sweetin et al
as 9:2010cv00135
Plaintiff:
Freddie R Coleman
Defendant:
David Sweetin, Gregory Oliver, Richard Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COBB v. ARAIZA et al
as 4:2009cv00272
Plaintiff:
Martin Cobb
Defendant:
JOSE ARAIZA and Rebecca Tamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewbre v. Thomas et al
as 4:2009cv01364
Plaintiff:
Marshall Alan Dewbre
Defendant:
Thommy Thomas, Billingsly, Coons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unidentified Parties et al v. Alford et al
as 1:2008cv00561
Plaintiff:
Unidentified Parties, Anthony Ray Gardner, David Gomez and others
Defendant:
FNU Alford, Richard P LeBlanc Unit Admin, Nathanial Quartermann and others
Movant:
James Eric Nachlinger
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cobb v. Simmons et al
as 2:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Luther Wayne Cobb
Defendant:
Timothy Simmons, Joe Nunn, Maryann Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Samuelson v. Wise County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Defendant:
Wise County Jail, Dee Anderson, Chris Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cobb v. Alford et al
as 1:2008cv00700
Plaintiff:
Augustus Ray Cobb
Defendant:
FNU Alford, Richard P LeBlanc Unit Admin, Nathanial Quartermann and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cobb v. State Of Texas
as 2:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Richard Aaron Cobb
Defendant:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
