Cases 41 - 50 of 209
Priester v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2019cv02103
Plaintiff:
Craig Priester
Defendant:
Warden Levern Cohen and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2019cv02107
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Levern Cohen and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2019cv02101
Plaintiff:
Brian Littlejohn
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Warden Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2019cv02105
Plaintiff:
Therl Taylor
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Warden Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2019cv02104
Plaintiff:
Sterling Harley
Defendant:
Warden Levern Cohen and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightner v. Stirling et al
as 2:2019cv01866
Plaintiff:
Michael M Lightner
Defendant:
Evans Correctional Institution, Charles Williams, Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Bostick et al
as 9:2019cv01794
Plaintiff:
Reco Miller and Reco Lamont Miller
Defendant:
Warden Bucken, Warden Cohen and Margaret Bostick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2019cv01537
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and LeVern Cohen
Petitioner:
Matthew Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. State of South Carolina et al
as 9:2019cv01461
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Leveran Cohen
Petitioner:
Quentin R. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Herriott v. Stirling et al
as 6:2019cv00804
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Willie Davis, Richard Cothran and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Edward Herriott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
