Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Moore v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00865
Plaintiff:
Thurmon E. Moore, II
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services , Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 6:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Myers
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Jerry Lovelace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01350
Plaintiff:
Alfonte Bailey
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Corizon Medical Services and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
Sean Tyler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Corizon Medical Services, CMS and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson v. Copeland et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00648
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Ms. Copeland , Corizon Medical Services , Nurse Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01160
Plaintiff:
Derrick Moss
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Medical Services
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.J. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01127
Plaintiff:
M. J.
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Medical Services
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.L.W. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01076
Plaintiff:
W.L.W.
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
X.J. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01075
Plaintiff:
X.J.
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Corizon Medical Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagwell v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
Chris Bagwell
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Stubbs and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
