Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Robertson v. County of San Mateo Sherriffs Dept.
as 4:2008cv03061
Plaintiff:
Derick C. Robertson
Defendant:
County of San Mateo Sherriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pagtakhan et al v. Burlingame Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv02188
Plaintiff:
Marlon E. Pagtakhan, Joanna E. Pagtakhan, Sara Marie French and others
Defendant:
Burlingame Police Department, Steve Wagstaffe, Eric M. Hove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowther v. Superior Court of California et al
as 4:2008cv01981
Plaintiff:
Raymond Crowther
Defendant:
Superior Court of California and County of San Mateo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chatman v. County of San Mateo et al
as 3:2008cv00050
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman
Defendant:
County of San Mateo, San Mateo County Sheriff's Department, Don Horseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guzman v. County of San Mateo et al
as 3:2007cv06294
Plaintiff:
Jaime F. Guzman
Defendant:
County of San Mateo and City of East Palo Alto Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv04922
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Grimes v. Superior Court of California County of San Mateo et al
as 4:2007cv03647
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent:
Superior Court of California County of San Mateo
Defendant:
Sarah Boxer and Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cheng v. Martin et al
as 3:2007cv03123
Plaintiff:
Cheng I. Cheng
Defendant:
B Martin, O'Dell, Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Horsley et al
as 5:2003cv05158
Plaintiff:
Christian R. Williams
Defendant:
Don Horsley , County of San Mateo and San Mateo County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
