Cases 41 - 50 of 205
REYES v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv00261
Petitioner:
ANGEL REYES
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
POULSON v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00268
Petitioner:
CHARLES POULSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBSON v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00266
Petitioner:
HOWARD GIBSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POLITE v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00156
Petitioner:
WILLIE E. POLITE
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DICKERSON v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DICKERSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELSER v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00066
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE BELSER
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv00005
Petitioner:
RAYMOND LAMAR PHILLIPS
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARD v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2009cv01628
Petitioner:
THOMAS P. RICHARD, SR.
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TUCKER v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2009cv05887
Petitioner:
TRACEY TUCKER
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HOWARD v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2009cv05823
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, MYRON STANISHEFSKI, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
